Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
fom

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 214
Posted: Feb 10, 2013 5:59 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> <b96a20cb-7991-4a49-84ca-6bd6585012c7@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

>> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote:
>>>
>>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with
>>> the semantics of identity is the source of its
>>> particular set of issues.
>>>
>>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets
>>>
>>> Please explain "existing set".

>>
>> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.

>
> That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new
> ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.
>
> Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.
>


What would be the consequence of that invariance?

Every potentially infinite set already exists.

Thus, potential infinity is immanent infinity.

This is Cantor's argument.

What is the arithmetical difference between immanent
infinity and omega?





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.