Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 214
Posted: Feb 10, 2013 7:17 PM

In article <fLmdnTlTk_rFu4XMnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:

> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:
> > In article
> > WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> >> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with
> >>> the semantics of identity is the source of its
> >>> particular set of issues.
> >>>
> >>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets
> >>>
> >>> Please explain "existing set".

> >>
> >> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.

> >
> > That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new
> > ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.
> >
> > Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.
> >

>
> What would be the consequence of that invariance?
>
> Every potentially infinite set already exists.

But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite.
--

Date Subject Author
2/10/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/10/13 Virgil
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 Virgil
2/11/13 fom
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 fom
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 fom
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 Virgil
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 Virgil