Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 7,005
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 214
Posted: Feb 10, 2013 7:17 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <fLmdnTlTk_rFu4XMnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:

> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:
> > In article
> > <b96a20cb-7991-4a49-84ca-6bd6585012c7@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> > WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> >> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with
> >>> the semantics of identity is the source of its
> >>> particular set of issues.
> >>>
> >>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets
> >>>
> >>> Please explain "existing set".

> >>
> >> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.

> >
> > That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new
> > ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.
> >
> > Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.
> >

>
> What would be the consequence of that invariance?
>
> Every potentially infinite set already exists.


But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.