Virgil
Posts:
4,491
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 214
Posted:
Feb 10, 2013 7:17 PM
|
|
In article <fLmdnTlTk_rFu4XMnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:
> > In article
> > <b96a20cb-7991-4a49-84ca-6bd6585012c7@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> > WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with
> >>> the semantics of identity is the source of its
> >>> particular set of issues.
> >>>
> >>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets
> >>>
> >>> Please explain "existing set".
> >>
> >> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.
> >
> > That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new
> > ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.
> >
> > Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.
> >
>
> What would be the consequence of that invariance?
>
> Every potentially infinite set already exists.
But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite.
--
|
|
