fom
Posts:
1,968
Registered:
12/4/12


Re: Matheology § 214
Posted:
Feb 11, 2013 12:20 AM


On 2/10/2013 6:17 PM, Virgil wrote: > In article <fLmdnTlTk_rFu4XMnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote: > >> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote: >>> In article >>> <b96a20cb79914a4984ca6bd6585012c7@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, >>> WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with >>>>> the semantics of identity is the source of its >>>>> particular set of issues. >>>>> >>>>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets >>>>> >>>>> Please explain "existing set". >>>> >>>> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite. >>> >>> That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new >>> ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered. >>> >>> Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new. >>> >> >> What would be the consequence of that invariance? >> >> Every potentially infinite set already exists. > > But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite. >
Which returns to the question of why he uses a definite article to refer to the plural multiplicity of diagonals...

