Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 214
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 12:20 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/10/2013 6:17 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article <fLmdnTlTk_rFu4XMnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:

>> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <b96a20cb-7991-4a49-84ca-6bd6585012c7@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>>> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>>>> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with
>>>>> the semantics of identity is the source of its
>>>>> particular set of issues.
>>>>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets
>>>>> Please explain "existing set".

>>>> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.

>>> That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new
>>> ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.
>>> Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.

>> What would be the consequence of that invariance?
>> Every potentially infinite set already exists.

> But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite.

Which returns to the question of why he uses a
definite article to refer to the plural multiplicity
of diagonals...

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2016. All Rights Reserved.