Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 fom Posts: 1,968 Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 214
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 12:20 AM

On 2/10/2013 6:17 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article <fLmdnTlTk_rFu4XMnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:
>

>> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:
>>> In article
>>> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>>

>>>> On 10 Feb., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/10/2013 3:38 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The relationship of the axiom of choice with
>>>>> the semantics of identity is the source of its
>>>>> particular set of issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> {{In fact it is true for existing sets
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.

>>>
>>> That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new
>>> ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.
>>>
>>> Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.
>>>

>>
>> What would be the consequence of that invariance?
>>
>> Every potentially infinite set already exists.

>
> But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite.
>

Which returns to the question of why he uses a
definite article to refer to the plural multiplicity
of diagonals...

Date Subject Author
2/10/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/10/13 Virgil
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 Virgil
2/11/13 fom
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 fom
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 fom
2/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
2/11/13 Virgil
2/11/13 Virgil
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 Virgil