fom
Posts:
1,033
Registered:
12/4/12
|
|
Re: Minimal Hausdorff Topology
Posted:
Feb 11, 2013 3:37 AM
|
|
On 2/11/2013 2:08 AM, William Elliot wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, fom wrote:
>
>> I am wondering about diagram for
>> example 100, Minimal Hausdorff Topology.
>
> From what book?
>
>> The "special" basis neighborhoods in
>> the diagram do not seem to coincide
>> with the defining conditions.
>>
>> The second coordinate has j>n for that
>> n indexing the basis neighborhood,
>> but the diagram seems to indicate j<n.
>
> It does not.
>
>> Also, if I am correct about the error
>> in the diagram, then should not the
>> inequality be changed to j>=n so that
>> there is a basis neighborhood associated
>> with the first row of the diagram as
>> with every other row?
>>
> No, it makes no difference if it's j >= n or j > n.
>
>> I am probably just misreading the
>> definition. But it has me confused.
>>
> It takes some study to understand.
>
> There are orders, that of A and that of Z+.
> The order for Z+ begins at the bottom with 1
> and goes to the top. Notice how at the top
> the rows of dots are closer that at the bottom
> indicating a two dimensional dot, dot, dot.
> for the rows.
>
Thanks. I simply inverted the order for Z+
Now it makes sense.
If you want to see how I am trying to
understand how to use it, open the
post on "distinguishability"
The post is way too long, but the
attempted application of the topology
is at the very end.
|
|
