The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: help with misprint (?) Counterexamples in topology
Replies: 9   Last Post: Feb 15, 2013 8:54 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Minimal Hausdorff Topology
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 2:36 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/11/2013 3:28 AM, William Elliot wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, fom wrote:
>> The post is way too long, but the attempted application of the topology
>> is at the very end.

> Yes, way to long, detailed, rambling and pointless.

I am sorry you feel that way.

I see you asking set-theoretic questions occasionally.

Are you aware that the axiom of determinacy is
characterized in terms of two-person games?

That post considered the construction of the
real numbers using Dedekind cuts.

Toward the end of that post, for the purposes
of constructing that topology, I broke up the
state tables and re-interpreted the situation
in terms of questions and determinations. That
is very close to a two-person game.

I do not know whether or not that analysis can
be "made pretty". And, I do not know if it can
be made more relevant to the game-theoretic

I doubt, however, that you can find any analysis
of the real numbers that even hints at an explanation
for the determinacy axioms in the context of any
one of their classical definitions.

But, again, thank you for your help. It is
greatly appreciated.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.