fom
Posts:
1,968
Registered:
12/4/12
|
|
Re: This is False. 0/0 {x | x ~e x} e {x | x ~e x} A single Principle
to Resolve Several Paradoxes
Posted:
Feb 11, 2013 2:51 PM
|
|
On 2/11/2013 12:12 PM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
> On Feb 6, 10:59 pm, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 2/5/2013 10:01 AM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
>>
<snip>
>>
>>> Of course the most efficient representation is a . . . written in
>>> a . . . language.
>>
>> I am working on an alphabet. Since my current understanding
>> of the functional behavior of truth functions consists of
>> 4096 equational axioms (16^3) the logical alphabet I am
>> developing is not tiny. At present, I have completed descriptions
>> for the 96 letters. The next level of complexity will involve
>> working out the details for approximately 40,000 geometric relations
>> between names....
>
> WADR if you have to figure out umpteen things, then that is not a very
> good axiomatization. OTOH if this is just legwork and you plan to see
> the pattern in what you did to create a small set of rules, then all
> the better - but do you still need so many?
it is an *alphabet* for
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=Xe0&sa=X&tbo=d&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1352&bih=634&tbm=isch&tbnid=8ouK4e-FTdvbNM:&imgrefurl=http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~navara/FOML/&docid=_NEpZqwdwv66VM&imgurl=http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~navara/FOML/beran_no.png&w=6558&h=2926&ei=uEkZUcbuJ8Ww2gWz9oGYCA&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:5,s:0,i:99&iact=rc&dur=706&sig=107358288967687406127&page=1&tbnh=131&tbnw=294&start=0&ndsp=30&tx=137&ty=42
to link up, using Karnaugh maps (toroidal arrays), with the
MOG array,
http://finitegeometry.org/sc/24/MOG.html
that relates to the 12-dimensional Golay code
>
> On July 2010 FOM "18 Word Proof"
FOM?
> proves that some of the theorems of
> the Theory of Computation are axioms of Incompleteness in Logic. (I
> recently added that some of the theorems of Program Synthesis are
> axioms to prove the theorems of Theory of Computation.) But we don't
> have to list all of those theorems that may be axioms! As long as we
> list the ones used in our finite discussion. (The FOM thread lists
> about 10.)
|
|
