In article <63f94004-9aed-4653-be8b-b20a510a44c3@e11g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 11 Feb., 11:55, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Feb 11, 8:50 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > > > There exists a natural number m such that d is line number m is false. > > Yes so, alas not quite correct if d is assumed to "exist". > > If d is assumed to exist, we have > > 1) We cannot *find* a natural number m such that d is the m-th line of > the list. > 2) We can prove that d is a line of the list.
What WM claims to be able to prove within his WMytheological world is irrelevant outside of it.
And since one can equally prove that there is a function from |N to the set of objects appearing in lines of that list, a least outside of that WMytheology, that there is such a function which is not listed.
At least if the set of elements of the members of that list has at least two members. --
