In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > This is Cantor's argument. > > Yes he made the same step. And his followers gladly accepted it. He > exchanged quantifyers on his "extended integers": > "For every integer n, there exists integer m: m >= n" > to > "There exists integer m, such that for every integer n: m >= n."
That might be true in Wolkenmuekenheim but nowhere else.
And whatever Cantor may have said, it was not said with the current notion of integer in mind. --