Virgil
Posts:
7,005
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology � 214
Posted:
Feb 11, 2013 4:47 PM


In article <70fda17308554819b1006f9254064b3c@e10g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> > This is Cantor's argument. > > Yes he made the same step. And his followers gladly accepted it. He > exchanged quantifyers on his "extended integers": > "For every integer n, there exists integer m: m >= n" > to > "There exists integer m, such that for every integer n: m >= n."
That might be true in Wolkenmuekenheim but nowhere else. And whatever Cantor may have said, it was not said with the current notion of integer in mind. 

