Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 6,972
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 214
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:47 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<70fda173-0855-4819-b100-6f9254064b3c@e10g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > This is Cantor's argument.
>
> Yes he made the same step. And his followers gladly accepted it. He
> exchanged quantifyers on his "extended integers":
> "For every integer n, there exists integer m: m >= n"
> to
> "There exists integer m, such that for every integer n: m >= n."


That might be true in Wolkenmuekenheim but nowhere else.

And whatever Cantor may have said, it was not said with the current
notion of integer in mind.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.