Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 214
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:47 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > This is Cantor's argument.
> Yes he made the same step. And his followers gladly accepted it. He
> exchanged quantifyers on his "extended integers":
> "For every integer n, there exists integer m: m >= n"
> to
> "There exists integer m, such that for every integer n: m >= n."

That might be true in Wolkenmuekenheim but nowhere else.

And whatever Cantor may have said, it was not said with the current
notion of integer in mind.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.