Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 214
Replies: 19   Last Post: Feb 11, 2013 4:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 6,972
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 214
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:52 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<f6273d42-dc9e-4252-ad38-3864124c6312@fd20g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 11 Feb., 08:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <b96a20cb-7991-4a49-84ca-6bd658501...@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> >    WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> > >> Every potentially infinite set already exists.
> >
> > > But none of them are, or ever can become, infinite.
>
> They cannot "become" actually infinite.

> >
> > Since such "sets" are neither finite nor not finite (infinite), they are
> > nonexistent.
> >
> > And in van Dalen, p 118, a letter from Brouwer summarising his thesis:
> >   "I can formulate:
> >        1.  Actual infinite sets can be created mathematically"

>
> As I already mentioned


WM always argues that black is white and white is black.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.