The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 210
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 210
Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:08 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
WM <> wrote:

> On 10 Feb., 23:17, Ralf Bader <> wrote:

> > > But it is interesting (and typical) that you try to distract the
> > > reader from the obvious actions ad hominem.

> >
> > Ad hominem or ad IP-address? This is another example where also absolute
> > non-mathematicians can see how you mix everything up until no traits of
> > reason are left.

> Dear you are really more stupid than anybody else that I know of. Of
> course they acted ad hominem in MO, because the question and the IP
> address of Hans enjoyed undisturbed existence for nearly one year.
> Only when I disclosed that Hans was me, the question was immediately
> closed.

The issue then was not the content of that particular post but the
content of WM's prior posts, which led to his being declared 'persona
non grata'.

In monitored NG's and other monitored media, the monitors has both the
right and the duty to exclude those who do mot meet their standards.

If sci.math were monitored, at least if by a real mathematician, WM
would long since have become 'persona non grata' here too.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.