On 11 Feb., 22:47, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > You do not see a contradiction in concluding > both > > everything that is in some line > of the list is in one line of the list. > > and > > there does not exist a natural number m > such that the potentially infinite sequence > d is equal to the potentially infinite > sequence given by the mth line. > Why do you distract the attention of the reader? Of course I see a contradiction. This contradiction has its origin in the assumption that a potentially infinite sequence is something that could be complete enough to be in a line or elsewhere.
Everybody can see it clearly here:
1 1, 2 1, 2, 3 ...
This list has everything that is in the diagonal in a line too. But nowhere we have a completed diagonal, not in a line and not in the diagonal.
