On Feb 12, 9:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 11 Feb., 22:47, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> You do not see a contradiction in concluding > > both > > > everything that is in some line > > of the list is in one line of the list. > > > and > > > there does not exist a natural number m > > such that the potentially infinite sequence > > d is equal to the potentially infinite > > sequence given by the mth line. > > Why do you distract the attention of the reader? > Of course I see a contradiction.
And unless you retract one or the other side, you will continue to assert a contradiction.
