On 12 Feb., 09:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 12, 9:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 11 Feb., 22:47, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> You do not see a contradiction in concluding > > > both > > > > everything that is in some line > > > of the list is in one line of the list. > > > > and > > > > there does not exist a natural number m > > > such that the potentially infinite sequence > > > d is equal to the potentially infinite > > > sequence given by the mth line. > > > Why do you distract the attention of the reader? > > Of course I see a contradiction. > > And unless you retract one or the other side, > you will continue to assert a contradiction.
Why are you lying? You know that I would be asserting a contradiction if and only if the premise was correct. Premise: The infinite sequence d can be somewhere. Conclusion: The infinite sequence d is in the list and is not in the list.
Every mathematician with some basic eduction in logic would know what to conclude. And I am sure, you also know it. Therefore I accuse you of lying, namely saying the untruth when knowíng the truth.
