The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 210
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ralf Bader

Posts: 488
Registered: 7/4/05
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted: Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM wrote:

> On 12 Feb., 08:04, Ralf Bader <> wrote:
>> WM wrote:
>> > On 10 Feb., 23:17, Ralf Bader <> wrote:
>> >> > But it is interesting (and typical) that you try to distract the
>> >> > reader from the obvious actions ad hominem.

>> >> Ad hominem or ad IP-address? This is another example where also
>> >> absolute non-mathematicians can see how you mix everything up until no
>> >> traits of reason are left.

>> > Dear you are really more stupid than anybody else that I know of. Of
>> > course they acted ad hominem in MO, because the question and the IP
>> > address of Hans enjoyed undisturbed existence for nearly one year.
>> > Only when I disclosed that Hans was me, the question was immediately
>> > closed.

>> Blablablabla. Ask your nanny what a rhetorical question is.

> A rhetorical question? Is that a question which shows that the
> questioner is an imbecile?

Hahahahaha. Each little child knows its nanny. You are too stupid even for

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.