Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 210
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ralf Bader

Posts: 305
Registered: 7/4/05
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted: Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM wrote:

> On 12 Feb., 08:04, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>> WM wrote:
>> > On 10 Feb., 23:17, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> > But it is interesting (and typical) that you try to distract the
>> >> > reader from the obvious actions ad hominem.

>>
>> >> Ad hominem or ad IP-address? This is another example where also
>> >> absolute non-mathematicians can see how you mix everything up until no
>> >> traits of reason are left.

>>
>> > Dear you are really more stupid than anybody else that I know of. Of
>> > course they acted ad hominem in MO, because the question and the IP
>> > address of Hans enjoyed undisturbed existence for nearly one year.
>> > Only when I disclosed that Hans was me, the question was immediately
>> > closed.

>>
>> Blablablabla. Ask your nanny what a rhetorical question is.

>
> A rhetorical question? Is that a question which shows that the
> questioner is an imbecile?


http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Hahahahaha. Each little child knows its nanny. You are too stupid even for
this.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.