In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 12 Feb., 09:55, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 9:44 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > Conclusion: The infinite sequence d is in the list and is not in the > > > list. > > > > Nope, we have the potentially infinite sequence d is in a > > line of the list > > (whatever that means, your words not mine) > > That means d is something that never is so complete that more than > FISs of it exist. Therefore only FISs of it can be somewhere.
But that only hold in your world of darkness, not in our brighter one. > > > and the potentially infinite sequence d is not equal to the > > potentially infinite sequence given by a line of the list. > > Of course not. By the way, the lines of the list are all finite: > > 1 > 12 > 123 > ... > > So we have not the problem with potentially infinite lines whcih of > course also cannot completely exist.
But you do have the problem of actually infinite lists, which you have to have in order to claim the actually infinite diagoanal is even close to being listed. --