The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Well Ordering
Replies: 4   Last Post: Feb 14, 2013 10:48 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Butch Malahide

Posts: 894
Registered: 6/29/05
Re: Well Ordering
Posted: Feb 13, 2013 6:22 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Feb 13, 4:17 am, William Elliot <> wrote:
> Let S be a set with cardinality aleph_nu.
> Since S is equinumerous with omega_nu, there's
> . . a bijection h:S -> omega_nu.
> Thus S is well ordered by x <= y when h(x) <= h(y);
> . . well ordered without using AxC.  Hm...

Yes, of course. The alephs are the cardinalities of the *well-
orderable* infinite sets. By saying that card S = aleph_{nu} you are
implicitly saying that S can be well-ordered. If S is not well-
orderable, its cardinality is incomparable with all sufficiently large
alephs. A Dedekind-finite infinite set is incomparable with all alephs.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.