Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: This is False. 0/0 {x | x ~e x} e {x | x ~e x} A single Principle

Replies: 53   Last Post: Feb 13, 2013 3:53 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 fom Posts: 1,968 Registered: 12/4/12
Re: This is False. 0/0 {x | x ~e x} e {x | x ~e x} A single Principle

Posted: Feb 13, 2013 3:53 PM

On 2/13/2013 2:23 PM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2:51 pm, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 2/11/2013 12:12 PM, Charlie-Boo wrote:> On Feb 6, 10:59 pm, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>>>> On 2/5/2013 10:01 AM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>>>> Of course the most efficient representation is a . . . written in
>>>>> a . . . language.

>>
>>>> I am working on an alphabet. Since my current understanding
>>>> of the functional behavior of truth functions consists of
>>>> 4096 equational axioms (16^3) the logical alphabet I am
>>>> developing is not tiny. At present, I have completed descriptions
>>>> for the 96 letters. The next level of complexity will involve
>>>> working out the details for approximately 40,000 geometric relations
>>>> between names....

>>
>>> WADR if you have to figure out umpteen things, then that is not a very
>>> good axiomatization. OTOH if this is just legwork and you plan to see
>>> the pattern in what you did to create a small set of rules, then all
>>> the better - but do you still need so many?

>>
>> it is an *alphabet* for
>>
>>
>> to link up, using Karnaugh maps (toroidal arrays), with the
>> MOG array,
>>
>> http://finitegeometry.org/sc/24/MOG.html
>>
>> that relates to the 12-dimensional Golay code
>>
>>
>>

>>> On July 2010 FOM "18 Word Proof"
>>
>> FOM?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> proves that some of the theorems of
>>> the Theory of Computation are axioms of Incompleteness in Logic. (I
>>> recently added that some of the theorems of Program Synthesis are
>>> axioms to prove the theorems of Theory of Computation.) But we don't
>>> have to list all of those theorems that may be axioms! As long as we
>>> list the ones used in our finite discussion. (The FOM thread lists

>
> Martin Davis' Foundations of Mathematics (a highly moderated site
> about research into Mathematical Logic.)

Thank you.

Date Subject Author
2/1/13 Graham Cooper
2/3/13 Charlie-Boo
2/3/13 Graham Cooper
2/3/13 Charlie-Boo
2/3/13 Graham Cooper
2/3/13 Graham Cooper
2/3/13 Charlie-Boo
2/3/13 Graham Cooper
2/3/13 Charlie-Boo
2/3/13 camgirls@hush.com
2/4/13 Charlie-Boo
2/4/13 billh04
2/4/13 Charlie-Boo
2/4/13 William Hale
2/4/13 Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
2/9/13 Graham Cooper
2/5/13 Charlie-Boo
2/4/13 Graham Cooper
2/5/13 Charlie-Boo
2/5/13 Graham Cooper
2/5/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
2/6/13 Graham Cooper
2/6/13 Charlie-Boo
2/4/13 fom
2/4/13 Charlie-Boo
2/4/13 fom
2/5/13 Charlie-Boo
2/7/13 fom
2/9/13 Charlie-Boo
2/9/13 Graham Cooper
2/11/13 Charlie-Boo
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 Graham Cooper
2/10/13 fom
2/10/13 Graham Cooper
2/11/13 Charlie-Boo
2/11/13 Charlie-Boo
2/11/13 Charlie-Boo
2/11/13 Graham Cooper
2/13/13 Charlie-Boo
2/11/13 Charlie-Boo
2/11/13 fom
2/5/13 Charlie-Boo
2/5/13 fom
2/6/13 fom
2/11/13 Charlie-Boo
2/11/13 fom
2/13/13 Charlie-Boo
2/13/13 fom
2/4/13 Graham Cooper
2/4/13 Charlie-Boo
2/5/13 Charlie-Boo