In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 15 Feb., 00:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > And just this criterion is satisfied for the system > > > > > > 1 > > > > 12 > > > > 123 > > > > ... > > > > > > For every n all FISs of d are identical with all FISs of line n. > > > > For every n there is an (n+1)st fison of d not identical to any FIS of > > line n. > > That does not prove d is not in the list, but only that d is not in > the first n lines of the list.
For every n.
So that demolishes WM's claim that there is some n such that d IS in the first n lines. --