Earlier in this book I called it EM-gravity and will retain that name. Even though much of gravity is due to the magnetic charge of magnetic monopoles.
When the Maxwell Equations are taken to be the axioms over all of physics, then gravity is the smallest EM attraction possible and the reason we see gravity on cosmic bodies is because they hold so much mass and this mass is proportional to the magnetic monopoles it contains. So, the old Newton-gravity is just the Maxwell Equations attraction of one magnetic monopole for another magnetic monopole. The force law is the same as Coulomb force law, only the relative strength is 10^40 weaker. Magnetic monopoles come in two types, a north and a south monopole and all four possible combinations are an attractive force, whether north to north, north to south, south to north, and south to south. It maybe the case that unlike magnetic monopole charges have a tiny bit more attraction force than the like charges, but it is the Maxwell Equations that will determine that.
Now in the Universe at large, we see more than just the plain old Newton Gravity, for we see solid-body-rotation. Here are a few examples of solid-body-rotation:
(1) barred spiral galaxies (2) many spiral galaxies (3) Saturn's Rings (4) Jupiter's Red-Spot (5) resonance of satellites with parent body such as the Jovian moons or Mercury with Sun
Now the theory of General Relativity by Einstein is crackpot nonsense and is fake physics. Einstein never made the Maxwell Equations the axioms of physics and he pays a dreadful price for that omission because General Relativity is nothing but science fiction and utter nonsense. The planet Mercury precession of perihelion is not explained by General Relativity but is explained by the solar radiation pressure. If GR were viable, then there would be a Venus precession and a Earth precession but those two planets are far enough away from the direct solar radiation pressure that there is no precession to speak of.
An easy experimental proof that GR is physics fakery is this experiment: Bubble Chamber tracks of the neutron versus proton, of the chemical elements and an ionized chemical element. If GR were true then no particle, even photons of high energy would have a straight line track in the bubble chamber. The only tracks in a bubble chamber that are curved are those particles with a magnetic or electric charge imbalance.
GR is reduced to the statement: "Mass bends Space and Matter follows the Curvature of bent Space." When we put that statement into the Maxwell Equations we see that it does not hold up, and Einstein should have sought to inject GR into the Maxwell Equations, but Einstein was never really a bright enough physicist. If you put GR into the Maxwell Equations, you have to alter the statement of GR to be this: "Charge bends Space and Matter follows the Curvature of that bent Space." The charge could be either electric charge, or dipole magnetic charge or monopole charge. Einstein is the typical physicist of the 20th century that comes up with theories of physics to please his own idiosyncratic wishes of whatever he falls in love with such as a elevator in space that imitates the force of gravity. And sadly enough, almost all the other physicists of the 20th century followed Einstein in how they put together a new theory-- idiosyncratic pet loves, rather than taking a axiom system as the heart of physics and having everything new put to the test of whether the axioms allow it or disallow the new proposed theory.
You see, for me and future physicists, we no longer have to be clever in dreaming up a new theory. We only have to be super cognizant of the Maxwell Equations and how they work. And if we run into some new physics phenomenon such as superconductivity or superfluidity or BEC, we do not do what Einstein or Bardeen Cooper Schrieffer, or Higgs, or Hawking, did, by dreaming up new mechanisms that were their own pet loves at the time. No, we do not do that crank crackpot nonsense. What we do as real physicists is simply pull out the Symmetrical Maxwell Equations as axioms and see if they permit and allow the new phenomenon and how they permit and allow that phenomenon.
Back to gravity.
Now it is a awful shame that we recently sent a flyby satellite mission to Saturn and have not proven to what percentage the Rings are solid body rotation. Is it 90% solid body? Is it 50% solid body rotation? Who knows. And did the satellite take enough photos that we can find out the percentage of solid body rotation of those ice crystal Rings. If not, then we wasted a mission to Saturn, because the most important question of Saturn is how much solid body rotation of its Rings.
Now previously I did not list the Red Spot of Jupiter as a solid body rotation phenomenon, but I should have. The literature says the Red Spot is a weather phenomenon. I can believe it is a weather aspect but a magnetic aspect of loosely held particles, much like the ice of Saturn's Rings and those magnetic particles are displaying solid body rotation.
Now some moons and the planet Mercury display orbital resonance. And Newton-gravity is really ill-equiped to explain resonance. Resonance is part of the Maxwell Equations theory, as a feature just before you reach solid-body-rotation. The planets around the Sun are in Newtonian gravity, not in solid body rotation, but if we moved closer to that of solid body rotation, we would first have the planets in a harmonic resonance to the Sun. The Rings of Saturn are in solid body rotation and at one stage earlier in their orbit those rings were in a resonance mode, and as the rotation went on further, the resonance turned into solid body.
Now it is a shame the Rings of Saturn have no bar to them, as in barred spiral galaxies that we can watch and see that the bars are solid body rotation. So that barred spiral galaxies are 100% solid body and others less than 100%. So why would stars have magnetic and electric charges to cause solid body rotation? They are not ice crystals like Saturn's ring, so what are stars in barred spiral galaxies? I can only guess that in older galaxies that there is a huge supply of iron present and in 14 billion years of evolving those stars that they reached a evenness or uniformity of magnetism and electricity that like the Coulomb force itself is a rotation of a vinyl phonograph record of the 1960s.
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine- bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here: