In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 17 Feb., 20:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Feb 17, 6:49 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > ards, WM > > > > Ok we have WM statement 1. > > > > There is a line l such that > > l and d are coFIS. > > There is no d! > There is for every FIS of d a FIS of a line.
If there were no d, then WM would not keep talkimg as if there were one.
> That's all we can know and say about d.
That may be all WM can say, but what he says is already more than the truth. > > > > WM denies saying > > > > There is no line l such that > > l and d are coFIS > > > > Do you agree > > > > For every natural number n, > > the nth line and d are not coFIS. > > On the contrary! For every latural number the n-th line and d_1, ..., > d_n are coFIS.