Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: Relativity in Two Postulates
Posted:
Feb 20, 2013 2:36 AM


On Feb 19, 8:09 am, Giovano di Bacco <gdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> relativity encapsulated > >  speed of light same for everybody
The constancy in the observed speed of light came from Voigt who discovered the Voigt transform being the earlier nonGalilean transform that satisfy the null results of the MMX. <shrug>
This has a lot of implications. The most overlooked one is the flat space ego where every observer will always observe his space to be flat even if his space appears and is observed to be hopelessly curved by someone else. Thus, the curvature of space is a relative comparison in concept. It all results in Voigt?s wisdom. <shrug>
>  gravity equivalent to acceleration
The principle of equivalence was a Galilean discovery where the Newtonian law of gravity becomes ever possible. So, this is not part of core curriculum of relativity. It is merely a principle in tradition. Without the principle of equivalence, Newtonian law of gravity would not be possible. There is no big deal in the principle of equivalence. However, when Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar finally understood the simple Newtonian law of gravity, the nitwit managed to reverseengineer the Newtonian law of gravity and since then had proclaimed the principle of equivalence as his own basic organic discovery. What an insult to scholars of history if you ask Koobee Wublee. <shrug>
> that is, now go ahead and do your tensors
The most basic tensor is the Riemann curvature tensor which has nothing to do with Riemann himself. Looking for how an object is able to move through perceived curved space, Christoffel trivially derived the geodesic equations. From the geodesic equations, Ricci saw and defined an operator that results in null 4velocity. Through double application of this manmade operator, now called the covariant derivative, a 4x4x4x4 (complete with 256 elements) matrix can be fudged in which Ricci who named it the Riemann tensor. Arbitrarily realizing 256 elements to a matrix is hopelessly useless. Ricci?s student, LeviCivita, condenses the 4dimental Riemann tensor into a 2 dimensional one which is now called the Ricci tensor with any scientific justifications. The whole tensor business of things is an idol of voodoo cult in practice. <shrug>



