On 18 Feb., 14:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please answer as politely: Is there any n with no line containing > > d_1, ..., d_n > > No.
Please answer without using phrases like "all" or "totality" or "complete collection" or "whole class" or "finished infinite" or "the set": Can you name a union of FISs of the diagonal that is missing in every line of the list?