In article <b110a688-4b1e-469d-9878-5d8542dc55a9@7g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 20 Feb., 00:04, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > In article > > <3631966c-7e49-45db-a3f9-03b9b9724...@f6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > It is self-evident that "for every natural number" is identical with > > > "up to every natural number". > > > > And to "for all natural numbers", as a quantifier. > > No, there are not all natural numbers