The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Schrodinger's Cat
Replies: 2   Last Post: Feb 21, 2013 9:02 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Marvin the Martian

Posts: 120
Registered: 5/24/09
Re: Schrodinger's Cat
Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:18:46 -0800, M Purcell wrote:

> On Feb 20, 11:51 am, Kevin <> wrote:
>> So there is the 2-D version of Schrodinger's Cat and a 3-D version,
>> neither of which I control. So the 2-D version is interesting...
>> curious... and relatively pain free... Does the 2-D version of
>> Schrodinger's Cat 'fold' because it is 2-D? Fine with me if it works in
>> my favor (yawn)... So the first rule of folding must be that it is
>> impossible to look directly into the eye of the Cyclops. But wait!! The
>> 2-D version of Schrodinger's Cat is just a bait or hook to make me feel
>> the same way about the 3-D version of Schrodinger's Cat... Yeah, well,
>> the 3-D version of Schrodinger's Cat seems contrived and maybe even
>> cartoonish... Maybe you should ask the alcoholic Santa with post
>> traumatic stress what he thinks about the 3-D version... but only after
>> he is done spraying the tall grass with machine gun fire.

> Here, kitty, kitty.


I don't particularly like Scientific American because it is too political
and deceptive.

Take the first quote of the article attributed to Schrodinger - it is out
of context. The context is that Heisenberg had been hammering Schrodinger
to admit that his matrix formulation of QM was the same as Schrodinger's
differential equation approach, and Schrodinger was sick of hearing it.

Then the article started to beat around the bush, and I don't have time
to waste on articles that try to be cute that way. That's why real
science articles generally have an abstract.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.