Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: when indecomposability is decomposable
Replies: 4   Last Post: Feb 21, 2013 8:51 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
fom

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: when indecomposability is decomposable
Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:51 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/21/2013 3:01 AM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> In <yfGdnVH3XuwxeLnMnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, on 02/20/2013
> at 09:03 AM, fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> said:
>

>> The validity of the inference being justified by
>> what stance?

>
> The axioms and the rules of inference.
>

>> A number of years ago, there was a John Correy on these newsgroups
>> who formulated a set of axioms that could be syntactically
>> manipulated to "prove" the existence of non-self-identicals.

>
> Within his theory.
>

>> He had been hammered on the basis of the ontological import
>> of x=x.

>
> Ontology is irrelevant. What matters is whether his work was
> consistent and interesting.
>
> BTW, there was a serious shift in how mathematicians viewed
> foundational issues after, e.g., Gödel, Cohen.
>


Yes. I know.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.