Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math.independent

Topic: Trying to understand Bayes and Hypothesis
Replies: 11   Last Post: Feb 22, 2013 3:09 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David Jones

Posts: 69
Registered: 2/9/12
Re: Trying to understand Bayes and Hypothesis
Posted: Feb 22, 2013 3:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Dave" wrote in message

(1) Theory says the "errors" should be normally distributed and no one
argues that a variety of goodness of fit measures reject it at p<.001 or
wherever the table stops.

(2) Theory says I should be able to minimize variance choosing an
expectation or maximize an expectation choosing a variance. Of course you
cannot do that with a Cauchy distribution.


Step (2) is incorrect, given the results of step(1). Given step (1),
"theory" says either:

(a) Chose an appropriate likelihood function, based on an acceptable
distribution. Use a large sample argument to justify a chi-squared test
based on a likelihood ratio test.

(b) Choose an appropriate objective function (goodness-of-fit measure), such
as a mean absolute difference. (Although this might need to be modified if
you are fitting both location and scale.) Construct a test statistic based
on this objective function, such as the improvement in the objective
function on moving to the wider model. Construct critical values for the
test statistic by undertaking a simulation study based on what you think are
acceptable null distributions.

If you were happy enough to do a Bayesian analysis, you might note that
several recent works have been implemented with structures where the "normal
distribution" assumption has been replaced by a Student's t distribution
with fixed but low degrees of freedom, which includes the Cauchy
distribution. Hence there is a good chance that you could find a Bayesian
analysis package that includes this facility, and this might prove a viable
route for you. Of course, you might find a"frequentist" package to do
something similar, if you need to look for pre-existing code ... you might
look under "general linear model".

David Jones

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.