Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: a formal construction of Dedekind cuts
Replies: 7   Last Post: Feb 27, 2013 4:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Charlie-Boo

Posts: 1,582
Registered: 2/27/06
Re: a formal construction of Dedekind cuts
Posted: Feb 23, 2013 7:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Feb 23, 7:00 am, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 9:55 am, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz<spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
> > In <M5qdncGgG5a-VbvMnZ2dnUVZ_rCdn...@giganews.com>, on 02/21/2013
> >    at 07:21 PM, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> said:

>
>  > >This is a formal construction.
>
>  > No; it's full of undefined terms.
>
>
>

> > --
> > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT  <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

>
> > Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action.  I reserve the
> > right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.  Reply to
> > domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do not
> > reply to spamt...@library.lspace.org

>
> He meant "This is a format construction."  He shows that the format
> used in set theory consists of braces.
>
> C-B


ROTFALMAO



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.