On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > ====================== > > > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L? > > No > > > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of > > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d. > > Or do you object to this fact? > > No. > > =============================== > > Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue > that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list? >
I agree that d "with *all its existence*" is in the lines of the list. I do not agree that this means d with all its existence is in one line of the list.