The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: rest-mass derived purely from Maxwell Equations summation of ridges
and troughs #1252 New Physics #1372 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 4   Last Post: Feb 24, 2013 5:13 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 838
From: nyc
Registered: 6/6/10
Re: rest-mass derived purely from Maxwell Equations summation of ridges and troughs #1252 New Physics #1372 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted: Feb 24, 2013 5:12 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> What I am doing here

Is dumping your off-topic stupidity . Stop!

Sci.math describes itself as:

An unmoderated newsgroup on general and advanced mathematics.

What gives you the right to repeatedly post off-topic,

with rest mass is not altogether
> new to physics
> but a continuation and elaboration of what is found
> in this textbook:
> In the textbook CHEM ONE by Waser, Trueblood,
> Knobler, 2nd ed., 1980,
> page 307 is a picture of the
> Debroglie waves for permitted and prohibited
> orbitals.
> And so the idea I am pursuing is that the electron
> has that ring
> shaped or closed loop shaped geometry and the ridges
> and troughs of E-
> charge and M+ or M- magnetic monopoles when added up
> gives rest-mass.
> So that a M+ ridge is a 1 eV rest mass and a E- ridge
> is another 1 eV
> rest mass and the troughs are each 1 more eV rest
> mass and so the
> electron in ground state sums up both ridges and
> troughs of E- and M+
> (perhaps M-) sums to a total of
> 500,000 eV rest-mass. The same goes for the proton of
> its troughs and
> ridges when summed equals 938,000,000 eV rest mass.
> Now there are a lot of kinks and issues I have to
> overcome, but that
> is to be expected. What I am concerned with is
> getting a general
> framework for the 6th edition and if I have kinks and
> issues, I can
> work them out in the 6th edition.
> Now I wonder if the electron wavelength has ever been
> measured and how
> many such ridges and troughs would exist in the
> hydrogen atom electron
> in ground state. So if these parameters are available
> and if they come
> up with say 400,000 or 500,000 or 600,000 such ridges
> and troughs, it
> is safe to say I conclusively discovered the meaning
> of rest-mass.
> And if the proton in hydrogen in ground state comes
> up with a number
> for the ridges and troughs to be about 1,000,000,000
> then there also I
> conclusively discovered the inner meaning of rest
> mass.
> I think the physics literature has some sort of
> numbers data of the
> wavelength of the proton and electron and how many
> troughs and ridges
> accrues from orbitals as shown in CHEM ONE.
> Now earlier today I wrote that the proton is likely
> to involve a
> volume of the wave but I rather doubt that, and
> suspect that the
> proton wave is a surface area of a ellipsoid, not a
> volume of the
> ellipsoid. So that the electron is circumference of C
> = pi(2r) and the
> proton is surface area of S.A.= 4pi(r^2). I changed
> my mind because
> the Maxwell Equations are about electricity which is
> a surface
> phenomenon more than a solid interior phenomenon. And
> the fact that
> 10^9 is easier to come by from squaring 10^4 or 10^5.
> Now probably the biggest kink in the armor of this,
> is likely to be
> that I need to inject the plutonium atom rather than
> the hydrogen atom
> ground state. So that the proton ellipsoid is going
> to be highly
> elongated whereas the hydrogen is closer to
> spherical.
> And keep in mind, the proton is the bar magnet in
> Faraday's law and
> the electron is the closed loop wire, so that the
> electron Space of
> its circle has to be far larger than the proton
> surface area that is
> going to be a plunging bar magnet into the electron
> closed loop. Now
> this maybe difficult to pull off since the electron
> has only 500,000
> ridges and troughs to work with while the proton has
> 938,000,000
> ridges and troughs to work with. I would be more
> comfortable if the
> electron had 938,000,000 ridges and troughs to build
> a closed loop
> wire.
> Another kink is whether only M+ resides with
> electrons or whether both
> M+ and M- reside.
> So I have a lot of issues, but do not care so long as
> I have the
> correct overall general framework. The fact that the
> chemistry text
> has almost the identical idea, except they do not
> push it further
> along into making rest mass, is supporting evidence
> that I am on the
> correct framework.
> --
> Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from
> search-engine-
> bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a
> excellent, simple and
> fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as
> seen here:
> Archimedes Plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.