On 24 Feb., 00:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ====================== > > > > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L? > > > No > > > > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of > > > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d. > > > Or do you object to this fact? > > > No. > > > =============================== > > > Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue > > that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list? > > I agree that d "with *all its existence*" > is in the lines of the list. > I do not agree that this means > d with all its existence is in > one line of the list.-
Remember: Potential infinity goes to every n, but not farther. And for every n d with all its existence is in line n of the list.
