On Feb 25, 12:11 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > Every line of L is capable of containing everything that > > its predecessors contain. > > And why then do you believe, or at least claim, that something that is > completely in the list must be distributed over more than one line?
I don't. My claim is that something that is completely in the list *may* be distributed over more that one line.
Anyway, we know the only possible exception has an "unfindable" index. Only those people who care about unfindable natural numbers (a group that includes WM but not me) are interested.