On Feb 25, 3:53 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> Once upon a time you have been asserting that more than one line are > necessary to contain all that can be contained of d. This collection > of lines may be a set - it does not matter. But every set of lines of > L has a first element. You cannot name the first element l_n, you > cannot name the n.
Again, the deliberate confusion between the number of elements in a set, and the elements of the set. Round and Round we go.
We both agree
There does not exist an m such that the mth line of L is coFIS with the diagonal (here we interpret "There does not exist" to mean "we cannot find").
Indeed if we throw findable in we agee with a lot of stuff.
There is no findable largest natural number.
There is no ball with a findable index in the vase.
