On Feb 25, 11:37 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 25 Feb., 16:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We both agree > > > There does not exist an m > > such that the mth line > > of L is coFIS with the diagonal > > (here we interpret "There does > > not exist" to mean "we cannot find"). >
Do you now wish to withdraw this statement?
<snip>
> > Indeed if we throw findable in > > we agree about a lot of stuff. > > > There is no findable largest natural > > number. > > > There is no ball with a findable index > > in the vase. > > And there is no findable set of natural numbers
Well there is certainly a potentially infinite set of findable natural numbers. This potentially infinite set contains all the natural numbers I need and use.
