Torsten
Posts:
1,703
Registered:
11/8/10
|
|
Re: Alternative solution for NAN
Posted:
Feb 27, 2013 4:58 AM
|
|
"Carl S." wrote in message <kgki2g$rie$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> The following code gives NAN (Not a Number) values
> [U,D]=eig(N);
>
> To solve this problem, I wrote that
> while(det(N) == 0)
> N=(1e-10.*randi(1,size(N)))*eye(size(N));
> end
>
> But, the loop does not stop
Your matrix N within the loop always has determinant (1e-10)^(size(N))
which may become very small if N is large.
:( Are there any alternative solution instead of this loop to solve the NAN problem ?
Depends on the original matrix N.
Best wishes
Torsten.
|
|
