On Feb 27, 1:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 26 Feb., 22:54, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now no one can stop you using whatever > > terminology you want. However, do not > > expect that you can use idiotic terminology > > without being considered an idiot. > > But one can use such arguing without being considered as such?
> Remember: Your point of view requires, what you often have emphasized: > There are all FIS of d in the list, but there is no line containing > them. This implies that they are distributed among several lines
or that m, the index of line they are in is a variable natural number and that it is silly to say that there is one line that contains every FIS when this "one" line has a variable as index.