On Feb 27, 1:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/27/13 11:26 AM, Mahipal wrote: > > > I watched your one minute of physics, now you read my one page of what > > Einstein should have written:http://mahipal7638.wordpress.com/meforce/ > > fwiw seeing is not reading. Also, technically there's no non-moving > > object in the Universe. Holding a box does not mean it's speed is > > zero==0. > > > -- Mahipal > > Can you find the flaw of your thinking in: > > >http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/mac.jpg
I found, however, a flaw in my sentence above... Holding a box does not mean its speed is zero==0. Should have writ.
Let me think, you Sam Worm Lie found a flaw in my thinking, yet leave me to tell you what it is. Now that I rethink it, the artistic font and sunrise backdrop are entirely wrong. Should've known, thanks!
Sam, you remind me of this "idiot professor" I had in senior year. He assigned a eigenvalues mathematical problem to the entire class, to solve a complicated beam vibrations issue. So then he calls me in to his ofice, I sat across his vast desk, and he politely compliments me for getting the proper answer. He asks me "How did you do it?!" and I just sat there. Awe struck. You mean you professor don't know how to solve the problem you assigned?
I guess he needed some text explanation to forward to whoever he was going to present the solution to. Oy.