On Feb 27, 8:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> Do you prefer your argument?
There is no disagreement over the facts.
We both agree that there is a natural number valued function of time, m(t), such that at any time t, m(t) is the index of an existing line which contains all existing FIS of d. We both agree that m(t) is not constant.
You think that describing this situation as "there is a line which contains all FISs of d" is sensible.
I think that describing this situation as "there is a line which contains all FISs of d" is idiotic.
I will not defend my position except to point out that many others agree with me, think that your claim "there is a line which contains all FISs of d" means something else, and hence treat you like an idiot for adhering to it.
