Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Deformable platonic "solids"
Replies: 23   Last Post: Mar 12, 2013 8:11 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David Hartley

Posts: 463
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Deformable platonic "solids"
Posted: Feb 28, 2013 6:15 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In message <kgn0oe$e31$1@dont-email.me>, David Bernier
<david250@videotron.ca> writes
>Are all agreed that the dodecahedron is deformable?
>I'm myself not sure what to think at present.


My "squashing" process was completely wrong. It worked with half a
dodecahedron but cannot be made to work with both halves together.

However the twisting idea is definitely possible. You can twist one face
without moving any other vertices. The face just moves inwards. Note
that the adjacent faces are no longer faces, in the sense that they are
no longer planar polygons. I suspect that the dodecahedron can't be
deformed without that happening, unlike the cube.

Twisting a single face like that requires that each vertex only has one
edge connected to the rest of the frame, i.e. only three edges total at
each vertex. Only the cube and dodecahedron have that.
--
David Hartley



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.