The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Deformable platonic "solids"
Replies: 23   Last Post: Mar 12, 2013 8:11 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David Petry

Posts: 1,104
Registered: 12/8/04
Re: Deformable platonic "solids"
Posted: Feb 28, 2013 1:44 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:48:04 AM UTC-8, Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <>,
> david petry <> wrote:

> >Any line segment joining two points reduces the
> >total number of degrees of freedom of the system of points and line
> >segments by one.

> Not in general. Consider a deformable solid with a square face.
> Joining two opposite corners will make that square rigid. Joining
> the other two will have no further effect, while adding a line
> somewhere else in the solid may.

Yes, of course, if the degrees of freedom are already minimal, they can't be reduced further. But the answer I gave does show us how to answer the original question.

"THEOREM" If a platonic solid has V vertices and E edges, then it will be rigid in the sense of Frederick Williams if and only if 3V - E = 6.


Tetrahedron: V = 4, E = 6, 3V-E = 6 (rigid)
Octahedron: V = 6, E = 12, 3V-E = 6 (rigid)
Cube: V = 8, E = 12, 3V-E = 12 (not rigid)
Dodecahedron: V = 20, E = 30 3V-E = 30 (not rigid)
Icosahedron: V = 12, E = 30, 3V-E = 6 (rigid)

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.