In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 27 Feb., 21:50, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > Note, there is no "set |N" in potential infinity. > > > > If one can distinguish natural numbers from things which are not natural > > numbers WHY is there no set of all natural numbers > > Because natural numbers like all numbers are names created by thinking > individuals. What has not been created is not there or somewhere else.
WM confuses those names with the things named.
One, two three, and so on, are names .
Ein, Zwei, Drei, und so weiter, are different names but name the same things. > > > > > Note that there is such a set everywhere else! > > Note that people have believed in witches with the same faithfulness.
No one burns sets at the stake. > > > > > The > > > "set |N" is an actual, i.e., completed infinity. But this assumption > > > is contradicted (see below). > > > > Not outside of WMYTHEOLOGY ! > > In the list > 1 > 1, 2 > 1, 2, 3 > ... > there is nothing unless it is in one single line.
Then there is nothing because you did not put in it in a single line. > > > >> Your LIST of lines is constructed so that there is no line containing > > all the elements in all the lines, > > There is no "all"