On Feb 28, 11:07 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 28 Feb., 20:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I was of the opinion we agree. Looks like > > I was wrong. I misinterpreted > > > > we have > > > a natural number valued function of time > > > (or of the number of FISs of d that "actually > > > exist", an increasing function of time) > > > m(t). It is trivial to see that there > > > is an m(t) such that the "actually existing" > > > line with index m(t), contains all > > > "actually existing" FISs of d. > > > WM: Exactly! > > > I still do not understand why I cannot > > take a simple natural number valued > > function of time, say a(t) and set it > > equal to m. >
I am confused. Do you think that there is an m(t) or not?
