In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 28 Feb., 22:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > Not all. Every! Again you fall back into actual infinity. > > > > We fall back on the fact that there is provably no line containing every > > FIS of d any more that one containing all FISs of d. > > There is provably no FIS of d filling every line. Remember; d is > nothing else that every FIS in pot. infinity.
How can I remember what I never knew.
Outside of WMytheology, d is the union of the actually infinite set of the lines which are its FISs.
What something may be seen as inside WMytheology is irrelevant to those not imprisoned in WMytheology's dank and dismal dungeons. --