Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Michael construction
Replies: 2   Last Post: Mar 2, 2013 4:01 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Butch Malahide Posts: 894 Registered: 6/29/05
Re: Michael construction
Posted: Mar 1, 2013 2:41 AM

On Feb 28, 10:27 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:
> Let M be a subset of a normal space S. Define S_M as S given the
> base { U, {x} | U open within S, x in M } (Michael construction).
>
> If in addition, S\M is normal, is S_M normal?

Let S = omega. Let the open subsets of S be the empty set, the whole
space S, and those cofinite subsets of S which do not contain 0. Let M
= S \ {1, 2}. S is normal, because every nonempty closed set contains
0. S \ M is normal, because it's discrete in its relative topology.
S_M is not normal, because it's a T_1-space but is not Hausdorff.

Date Subject Author
2/28/13 William Elliot
3/1/13 Butch Malahide
3/2/13 William Elliot