The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Attitudes to mathematics among successful research mathematicians
Replies: 4   Last Post: Mar 1, 2013 7:38 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 409
Registered: 3/1/08
Re: Attitudes to mathematics among successful research mathematicians
Posted: Mar 1, 2013 7:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Feb 16, 2:14 am, Paul <> wrote:
> Hardy wrote this in A mathematician's apology
> "I do not remember having felt, as a boy, any passion for mathematics, and such notions as I may have had of the career of a mathematician were far from noble. I thought of mathematics in terms of examinations and scholarships: I wanted to beat other boys, and this seemed to be the way in which I could do so most decisively."
> I wonder if this type of attitude is prevalent among successful research mathematicians, even among the world's elite.  Do all renowned mathematicians have a strong aesthetic sense of the beauty of mathematics or is the main motivation often that doing well at it allows people to believe that they're more intelligent than others?
> I suspect that many renowned mathematicians don't really have a strong aesthetic appreciation of maths at all, but the motivation is often a competitive motivation, and the desire to be thought to be intelligent.
> This becomes obvious when elegant and remarkable concepts get discovered, and the vast majority of mathematicians are completely indifferent unless they can use these concepts or results in their research.
> For example, how many mathematicians have any motivation to find out about surreal numbers? Few, I would think. If someone is in PDEs for example and doesn't use algebra, and has forgotten undergrad Galois theory, how many of such people can be bothered to open an undergrad textbook and relearn it?
> Paul Epstein

That may be true, but there is also truth in the converse : passionate
mathematicians , those with strong platonic/ aesthetic inclinations
often have a hard time in current academia . For one thing , there are
no 'generalists' anymore . There is no place for such a concept today.
Academia is geared toward producing 'specialists' and destroying
generalists . Busy buzzing bees . You almost wouldn't say that
Mathematics is 'one subject' anymore .
'Publish or perish' is an ideology of quantity over quality .

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.