On Mar 2, 1:17 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 1 Mrz., 23:51, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The argument is not only time. > > > m can change even though the time does not ? > > The maximum depends on the personal environment, the capability to > abbreviate numbers, the wish to do so, and many more factors. It > invents relativity into mathematics. > >
Oh so m is not only an unfindable, variable natural number. Everyone has their own personal m.
I'm glad we have things like m, because otherwise we would have to conclude some counterintuitive things are correct.
Still there is nothing to stop me having my own personal m(t) which is different from your m(t).
The fact that the your m(t) is different from my m(t) should not detract from the fact that we both agree that there is a natural number valued function of time, m(t), such that at any time t, m(t) is the index of an existing line which contains all existing FIS of d. We each believe that our m(t) is not constant.
