> On 2 Mrz., 17:18, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 2, 1:17 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: >> >> > On 1 Mrz., 23:51, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > > The argument is not only time. >> >> > > m can change even though the time does not ? >> >> > The maximum depends on the personal environment, the capability to >> > abbreviate numbers, the wish to do so, and many more factors. It >> > invents relativity into mathematics. >> >> Oh so m is not only an unfindable, variable >> natural number. Everyone has their own >> personal m. > > Of course. Imagine a world without intelligence. What would be that > largest number? What would be a number? > > In relativity no spacetime without energy/mass. > In MatheRealism no numbers without intelligent beings.
So there are no numbers in "MatheRealism". If you would have said this some ten years ago it would have saved us a lot of ado.