Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Given I Exist...
Posted:
Mar 2, 2013 7:25 PM
|
|
On Mar 2, 2:29 pm, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Given I exist...
>
> I AM NONADAPTIVEBOT...WOULD THE LESBIAN COMMUNITY CARE TO ENGAGE ME IN
> THE PRIVACY OF A RENTED MOTEL ROOM? I EXIST TO SERVICE YOUR NEEDS.
>
> Sartre says that 'Existance is futile'... Could this be Hitler's Big
> Lie? Sartre mocks Hitler in a big way if it is true. I do antimatter
> space definitions... It is impossible that I am not insane, right? But
> I'm technically not insane given that I am nonadaptive. My earlier
> fractal argument was that I can tentatively be a 'brute variety or
> pattern male'... but then I spite Fermilab by being dismissive of
> fractals. (It is impossible that anyone at the Rice U's Space Science
> Building is nonadaptive.) My interview with the Rice U's faculty
> member seems to suggest that he thinks I'd be better off going to the
> physics department but my belief is that the autistic types in physics
> brutalize students believing that it is a good conditioning routine or
> something. I don't trust physics is the simple truth of the matter.
> Richard Smalley intrigues me because he doesn't seem to trust physics
> either. Maybe it is just my misconception but Richard Smalley seems to
> have chosen Chemistry for the same reason I don't trust physics.
> Physics? Chemistry? What's the differance? They say the nano-scale is
> sanctioned for Chemistry? So? What's the differance? Physics or
> Chemistry needs my antimatter space definitions and do you know why?
> It is because I don't believe in flying saucers or UFOs... but the
> people in physics who believes in these things are nonadaptive. flying
> saucers and UFOs are caused by nuclear bomb tests which we don't have
> anymore. I am fearless but I would not be fearless if I was feeble
> minded and believed in flying saucers. I am nonadaptive and I can wipe
> the slate clean for the sake of fusion and my antimatter space
> definitions.
>
> So 80 IQ dude claims to be clairvoyant... and claims that I have
> sin... Well, ya see, 80 IQ dude is adaptive... 80 IQ dude can adapt to
> rap music which is a scourge on society... He is nearly giddy with the
> pride that he has given his aptitude for adaptation. I am not
> adaptive... but I am clairvoyant, ya see? 80 IQ dude's pathology is
> rap music. I'm doing strings and I can hear his pathology. There is
> not an issue between me and him at a personal level but the society he
> adapts to plys in his favor to my detriment. (Yo, dudes... I need just
> enough money so that I can buy myself a rope to hang myself with... Is
> there a problem? (I can determine no redeeming properties of a negro
> who is under the influence of rap music, ergo, I am nonadaptive...
> (Abstract art is a piece of junk that pretentious people buy so that
> the artist wount be a 'starving artist'... How come I'm expected to
> starve? I'm not argumentative against an artist's desire to have
> food.)))
>
> 80 IQ dude is the captain of Academe's boat now, ya see. The sole
> purpose of Academe is to give students who make C's and D's the
> stucture needed to feel proud and to feel a sense of accomplishment
> from the learning process. And furthermore, Academe should severely
> punish any student who tries to humiliate the other students by making
> A's and B's, (Can I get an Amen, my brothers and sisters!!)... 80 IQ
> dude is extremely irate that 'Hooked on Phonics' has become passe in
> Academe's system (Which was geared towards helping C and D students
> learn.)... and frankly, I agree with him because not only is he the
> expert... but also because if 'Hooked on Phonics' creates adaptive
> members of society then how is that necessarily a bad thing? Well,
> Hooked on Phonics Dude, what do you have in terms of quid pro quo with
> regards to getting rid of antilock brakes?... Ya see, antilock brakes
> were designed to put GPS in control of that aspect of the driver that
> is supposed to be in control of your vehicle... It is in the best
> interests of the government to have GPS in control of your vehicle
> instead of the driver. For safety reasons, the government ultimately
> wants GPS in control of every vehicle. Since I'm doing hypnosis as my
> thesis, I suppose antilock brakes are analygous to a belligerant and
> bellicose black female... Antilock brakes are the hypnotic plane that
> one must pass through to get on the pathway that leads to the eye of
> the Cyclops. Well, ya know, at least there is a parallel to the Black
> Hawk eyepatch that I can draw on... Black Hawk, antilock brakes, and a
> belligerant and bellicose black female are the things which vault me
> into GPS space, time and time again. The path to the eye of the
> Cyclops is more important than the destination... If I'm expected to
> be paranoid because the eye of the Cyclops is looking over my
> shoulder, then that is not going to cut it. If I'm waking up startled
> and turning around to see this huge eye that is 10 times bigger than
> it should be then what information is that supposed to convey to me?
> What is obviously the case is that at the center of the pupil of the
> eye of the Cyclops is a gigantic Star of David that is so big that it
> blacks out the entire night sky...
>
> What's invariably true is that violence never solves anything but who
> does that actually apply to? It is true in the case of the British...
> An insane King of (one of the Scandinavian countries) was subject to
> acts of violence against his person by the British and it didn't solve
> anything... It also applies to black folk as well. It is always true
> of black folk that violence never solves anything because I, being
> both white and quite insane, would probably die from the cataclysmic
> orgasm of happiness if any black person on earth actually had the
> intestinal fortitude to put his money where his mouth is. I don't
> typically dwell or lecture on the subject of violence... What I ask
> instead is: Is it worth dying for?
>
> I have no ethical concerns being at Rice U to present my thesis
> without a proper introduction... (Rice U is concerned that the ax that
> I have to grind wrt the Jews, in particular, and given that
> psychiatry's is 'unyielding' makes it untenable for me to find
> sanctuary at Rice U.) Given that the Jews are both pretentious and
> fearless while everybody else is pretentious and fearful makes Jewish
> arrogance untenable. It certainly cannot be the case that the mounting
> pretentiousness levels in American society means that I shoud have any
> concerns that 'money grubbing Jews' should be construed as being
> antisemetic... 'money grubbing Jews' is overly cute at best.
strangely I have never even had an inkling or deep desire to see to
blokes flog it in my bed now why would that be now, huh!
|
|
|
|
