On Mar 2, 2:29 pm, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Given I exist... > > I AM NONADAPTIVEBOT...WOULD THE LESBIAN COMMUNITY CARE TO ENGAGE ME IN > THE PRIVACY OF A RENTED MOTEL ROOM? I EXIST TO SERVICE YOUR NEEDS. > > Sartre says that 'Existance is futile'... Could this be Hitler's Big > Lie? Sartre mocks Hitler in a big way if it is true. I do antimatter > space definitions... It is impossible that I am not insane, right? But > I'm technically not insane given that I am nonadaptive. My earlier > fractal argument was that I can tentatively be a 'brute variety or > pattern male'... but then I spite Fermilab by being dismissive of > fractals. (It is impossible that anyone at the Rice U's Space Science > Building is nonadaptive.) My interview with the Rice U's faculty > member seems to suggest that he thinks I'd be better off going to the > physics department but my belief is that the autistic types in physics > brutalize students believing that it is a good conditioning routine or > something. I don't trust physics is the simple truth of the matter. > Richard Smalley intrigues me because he doesn't seem to trust physics > either. Maybe it is just my misconception but Richard Smalley seems to > have chosen Chemistry for the same reason I don't trust physics. > Physics? Chemistry? What's the differance? They say the nano-scale is > sanctioned for Chemistry? So? What's the differance? Physics or > Chemistry needs my antimatter space definitions and do you know why? > It is because I don't believe in flying saucers or UFOs... but the > people in physics who believes in these things are nonadaptive. flying > saucers and UFOs are caused by nuclear bomb tests which we don't have > anymore. I am fearless but I would not be fearless if I was feeble > minded and believed in flying saucers. I am nonadaptive and I can wipe > the slate clean for the sake of fusion and my antimatter space > definitions. > > So 80 IQ dude claims to be clairvoyant... and claims that I have > sin... Well, ya see, 80 IQ dude is adaptive... 80 IQ dude can adapt to > rap music which is a scourge on society... He is nearly giddy with the > pride that he has given his aptitude for adaptation. I am not > adaptive... but I am clairvoyant, ya see? 80 IQ dude's pathology is > rap music. I'm doing strings and I can hear his pathology. There is > not an issue between me and him at a personal level but the society he > adapts to plys in his favor to my detriment. (Yo, dudes... I need just > enough money so that I can buy myself a rope to hang myself with... Is > there a problem? (I can determine no redeeming properties of a negro > who is under the influence of rap music, ergo, I am nonadaptive... > (Abstract art is a piece of junk that pretentious people buy so that > the artist wount be a 'starving artist'... How come I'm expected to > starve? I'm not argumentative against an artist's desire to have > food.))) > > 80 IQ dude is the captain of Academe's boat now, ya see. The sole > purpose of Academe is to give students who make C's and D's the > stucture needed to feel proud and to feel a sense of accomplishment > from the learning process. And furthermore, Academe should severely > punish any student who tries to humiliate the other students by making > A's and B's, (Can I get an Amen, my brothers and sisters!!)... 80 IQ > dude is extremely irate that 'Hooked on Phonics' has become passe in > Academe's system (Which was geared towards helping C and D students > learn.)... and frankly, I agree with him because not only is he the > expert... but also because if 'Hooked on Phonics' creates adaptive > members of society then how is that necessarily a bad thing? Well, > Hooked on Phonics Dude, what do you have in terms of quid pro quo with > regards to getting rid of antilock brakes?... Ya see, antilock brakes > were designed to put GPS in control of that aspect of the driver that > is supposed to be in control of your vehicle... It is in the best > interests of the government to have GPS in control of your vehicle > instead of the driver. For safety reasons, the government ultimately > wants GPS in control of every vehicle. Since I'm doing hypnosis as my > thesis, I suppose antilock brakes are analygous to a belligerant and > bellicose black female... Antilock brakes are the hypnotic plane that > one must pass through to get on the pathway that leads to the eye of > the Cyclops. Well, ya know, at least there is a parallel to the Black > Hawk eyepatch that I can draw on... Black Hawk, antilock brakes, and a > belligerant and bellicose black female are the things which vault me > into GPS space, time and time again. The path to the eye of the > Cyclops is more important than the destination... If I'm expected to > be paranoid because the eye of the Cyclops is looking over my > shoulder, then that is not going to cut it. If I'm waking up startled > and turning around to see this huge eye that is 10 times bigger than > it should be then what information is that supposed to convey to me? > What is obviously the case is that at the center of the pupil of the > eye of the Cyclops is a gigantic Star of David that is so big that it > blacks out the entire night sky... > > What's invariably true is that violence never solves anything but who > does that actually apply to? It is true in the case of the British... > An insane King of (one of the Scandinavian countries) was subject to > acts of violence against his person by the British and it didn't solve > anything... It also applies to black folk as well. It is always true > of black folk that violence never solves anything because I, being > both white and quite insane, would probably die from the cataclysmic > orgasm of happiness if any black person on earth actually had the > intestinal fortitude to put his money where his mouth is. I don't > typically dwell or lecture on the subject of violence... What I ask > instead is: Is it worth dying for? > > I have no ethical concerns being at Rice U to present my thesis > without a proper introduction... (Rice U is concerned that the ax that > I have to grind wrt the Jews, in particular, and given that > psychiatry's is 'unyielding' makes it untenable for me to find > sanctuary at Rice U.) Given that the Jews are both pretentious and > fearless while everybody else is pretentious and fearful makes Jewish > arrogance untenable. It certainly cannot be the case that the mounting > pretentiousness levels in American society means that I shoud have any > concerns that 'money grubbing Jews' should be construed as being > antisemetic... 'money grubbing Jews' is overly cute at best.
strangely I have never even had an inkling or deep desire to see to blokes flog it in my bed now why would that be now, huh!