The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: |R| > oo
Replies: 26   Last Post: Mar 8, 2013 8:55 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,495
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: |R| > oo
Posted: Mar 2, 2013 11:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 3, 1:44 pm, William Elliot <> wrote:
> oo < |R| is nonsense;  aleph_0 < |R| is well known.
> Since |R| is a cardinal number and oo is a point of the extended
> reals, oo has no cardinality and hence not comparable with |R|.

Different poster = different story

Since Rupert and Will skip any questions no use discussing anything
with them.

P=1 D(L') = AD(L)

True or not Fraud?

What's missing from this list Fraud?


Oh I forgot - maths not your strong point.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.