
Re: R > oo
Posted:
Mar 2, 2013 11:16 PM


On Mar 3, 1:44 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote: > oo < R is nonsense; aleph_0 < R is well known. > > Since R is a cardinal number and oo is a point of the extended > reals, oo has no cardinality and hence not comparable with R. >
Different poster = different story
Since Rupert and Will skip any questions no use discussing anything with them.
P=1 D(L') = AD(L)
True or not Fraud?
What's missing from this list Fraud?
0.00.,. 0.00.. ..
Oh I forgot  maths not your strong point.
Herc

