|
|
Re: |R| > oo
Posted:
Mar 2, 2013 11:16 PM
|
|
On Mar 3, 1:44 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:
> oo < |R| is nonsense; aleph_0 < |R| is well known.
>
> Since |R| is a cardinal number and oo is a point of the extended
> reals, oo has no cardinality and hence not comparable with |R|.
>
Different poster = different story
Since Rupert and Will skip any questions no use discussing anything
with them.
P=1 D(L') = AD(L)
True or not Fraud?
What's missing from this list Fraud?
0.00.,.
0.00..
..
Oh I forgot - maths not your strong point.
Herc
|
|
