The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: How can NO LOGICIAN follow this argument??
Replies: 13   Last Post: Mar 5, 2013 11:06 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,495
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: How can NO LOGICIAN follow this argument??
Posted: Mar 3, 2013 1:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 4, 12:21 am, George Greene <> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 12:43 am, Graham Cooper <> wrote:

> > Godel and Tarski proofs were  PRE AXIOMATIC SET THEORY!
> Nobody can help it if YOU'RE *STUPID*.  Zermelo axiomatized set theory
> in 1903.
> Godel's incompleteness theorems were proved in 1930.  Nobody can help
> you if you
> think 30 is pre- 03.

Then WHY cannot you spot the FLAW that I have EXPLICITLY POINTED OUT?

You CANNOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE the argument because



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.