
Re: How can NO LOGICIAN follow this argument??
Posted:
Mar 3, 2013 1:54 PM


On Mar 4, 12:21 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: > On Mar 3, 12:43 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Godel and Tarski proofs were PRE AXIOMATIC SET THEORY! > > Nobody can help it if YOU'RE *STUPID*. Zermelo axiomatized set theory > in 1903. > Godel's incompleteness theorems were proved in 1930. Nobody can help > you if you > think 30 is pre 03. >
Then WHY cannot you spot the FLAW that I have EXPLICITLY POINTED OUT?
You CANNOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE the argument because
SCI.LOGIC ARE ALL A BUNCH OF LIARS!
HERC  WWW.BLoCKPROLOG.COM

