In article <98f9bb71-e491-4335-ae66-617ec9d86dd2@w3g2000vba.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 3 Mrz., 11:37, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 3, 11:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > On 3 Mrz., 00:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > But "there are all FIS" is not a contradiction, if they must be in > > > more than one line of a list that contains only lines that contain > > > everything that is in all preceding lines? > > > Amazing. > > > > The above just says that if there all all > > FIS then the list has no last line. > > Not Amazing. > > The above may say what you like. It is provably false.
If it were provably false, any competent mathematician would prove it false. But since WM has never managed to prove it false, at least without assuming things that are standardly rejected outside of WMytheology, Either there is no such proof outside WMytheology or WM is not competent to produce one.
Or both.
> Why don't you simply try to find a potentially infinity set of natural > numbers
Why should we bother to look for things we do not believe exist? --
